Categories
Cherub Magazine
Search
Browse by section

Looksmaxxing: The Gendered Politics of Male Beauty Culture
Looksmaxxing has its own language. But beneath the jargon is something much older — the fear that the body we were given is not enough.
By Grace McLoughlin
M
ewing. Mogging. Hunter Eyes. Jawmaxxing. Heightmaxxing.
The vocabulary of 'looksmaxxing' reads like a strange new dialect of the internet, often dismissed as an online oddity: part self-help manual, part adolescent pathology, part beauty tutorial.
Feminist theory, under logics of historical bodily scrutiny and objectification, has long explored the experience of seeing oneself through an imagined external gaze. There is a feminine condition where women understand the rituals of correction and concealment: the foundation that promises to erase the face we were born with, the serum, the diet that promises to shrink the body, the procedures. When women become fluent in the psychology of the beauty industry, there is a cultural vocabulary available to describe it. Conversations about body dysmorphia, eating disorders, self-esteem, or insecurity, despite still vulnerable, mean that the connection between beauty culture and feminine distress are recognisable.
'Women on Men: Reversing the Male Gaze', Colin Hilary Loyd (1999)
'Women on Men: Reversing the Male Gaze', Colin Hilary Loyd (1999)
On the other hand, the same preoccupation that might be understood as pathology in a woman can become self-improvement for a man. 'Looksmaxxing' revolves around a limiting grammar - one that reduces the male beauty standard to an extreme manifestation of vanity, an algorithmic rabbit hole populated by teenage boys. 'Looksmaxxing' exposes a gendered double standard in how we understand the body: women's beauty anxiety is often pathologised as feminine insecurity, while men's can be rewarded as masculine optimisation:
A male does not have body dysmorphia, he is 'looksmaxxing'. He is not anxious about his appearance; he is optimising it. A man has no fear that he is undesirable. No, he is improving his sexual market value.
At the heart of 'looksmaxxing' is the language of sexual market value- the idea that desirability can be quantified, ranked, and increased. It is a distinctly neoliberal fantasy applied to the body: if you are not getting the romantic attention you want, the answer is not to question the system but to optimise yourself within it; hence, the word 'maxxing' suggesting a philosophy of perfectionism. The body is treated as capital, and attraction as a market in which some men are simply better positioned than others. And, if every aspect of the self can be measured, then every perceived deficiency demands improvement...
Musclemaxxing, skinmaxxing, socialmaxxing, skinmaxxing.
There is always another metric to optimise, another weakness to correct. The most unsettling implication is that if a man remains undesirable, the failure is his alone: he simply did not optimise enough. Desirability, in this sense, turns into a form of personal productivity, where the self is both the worker and the product being sold.
Sound slightly familiar? Classical literature captures the pre-digital fantasy that desirability can be engineered. Nearly a century before the language of 'looksmaxxing' entered the internet's daily lexicon, F.Scott Fitzgerald's Jay Gatsby was already engaged in his own form of optimisation. In a consuming attempt to recapture the sexual and social value he believes was lost with Daisy, Gatsby constructs a hyper-inflated personal brand built from wealth, clothing, and aesthetic excess. Gatsby is the archetypal 'maxxer': he treats the self as a project, identifies perceived deficiency, and attempts to optimise his way out of it; his logic updated for the algorithmic age. And ultimately, the tragedy of the maxxer, like Gatsby, is not wanting to be attractive, but believing that becoming attractive enough might finally make them worthy of love.
Nevertheless, the contemporary maxxer, under intense proximity to social media, faces increased pressure: within spaces linked to the manosphere (particularly incel and lookism forums), male body modification is guided by peer evaluations, aggressive feedback, and shared knowledge, forming bro-pedagogy: a masculine and brutal style of support. Catalysing a more threatening beauty ideal, the algorithm gives men a community to measure themselves against. Unlike Gatsby, there is no closing the curtains on the party; instead, the feedback follows you into your bedroom.
The contradiction reveals itself in an age of celebrity culture, where men are encouraged to perfect themselves under the implicit promise that beauty will make them more desirable to women. The message is familiar: your body is your social currency. Where women have historically been told they must be beautiful to be valued, men are now being sold a parallel fantasy: they can engineer themselves into desirability. Like a shadow, the culture that insists desirability as a hierarchy becomes inescapable and suffocating... but the stigma around male vulnerability makes the problem uniquely difficult to confront.
The patriarchy has historically cast women as the emotionally weaker sex: hysterical and irrational, too preoccupied with their bodies. In contrast, masculinity has been constructed in opposition to these feminine flaws, with men expected to embody a rationality or control that is superior to the opposite sex. So now when men are experiencing the very anxieties that have been stereotyped as feminine, they risk admitting to the very vulnerability that masculinity has taught them to despise. The result is a cruel paradox: men may be suffering under a similar beauty standard, yet the suffering is difficult to recognise as something deserving of care.
The tragedy is that the more desperately the self is optimised, the more elusive the feeling of being enough becomes. 'Looksmaxxing 'may appear to be about the pursuit of the perfect face, though beneath the jargon, is something much older and much more human: the fear that the body we have been given is not enough.
Discussing gender politics under trending terminology progresses through the lens of clinical reflection. In accurate psychological settings, the mindset overwhelming young and still-developing brains are resulting in behaviours that clearly resemble symptoms of eating disorders and body dysmorphia. The obsessive and compulsive interference deserves exploration; as with all mental health concerns, how society shapes a problem shapes a response to it. Unashamed, using voice and intellectual criticism, the impact of masculine trends should be considered under appropriate media guidelines. Using the same precedent that responded to eating disorder culture, responding to looksmaxxing as a clinical issue can connect young men to the support they need.
Discussing gender politics under trending terminology progresses through the lens of clinical reflection. In accurate psychological settings, the mindset overwhelming young and still-developing brains are resulting in behaviours that clearly resemble symptoms of eating disorders and body dysmorphia. The obsessive and compulsive interference deserves exploration; as with all mental health concerns, how society shapes a problem shapes a response to it. Unashamed, using voice and intellectual criticism, the impact of masculine trends should be considered under appropriate media guidelines. Using the same precedent that responded to eating disorder culture, responding to looksmaxxing as a clinical issue can connect young men to the support that they need.
If you or someone you know is struggling with body image, disordered eating, or appearance-related anxiety, support is available.
Beat is the UK's eating disorder charity, offers a helpline Monday to Friday, 3–8pm. The Laurence Trust provides confidential support specifically for men with eating disorders. HeadsUpGuys is a men's mental health resource with practical tools and guidance. If you are looking for a specialist, the National Alliance for Eating Disorders offers a therapist directory at allianceforeatingdisorders.com.
You don't have to call it looksmaxxing for it to be worth talking about.
6 Likes
Cherub Magazine
Subscribe to our newsletter


